Su, Y and Lucko, G (2015) Synthetic cash flow model with singularity functions. I: Theory for periodic phenomena and time value of money. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(3), ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Precisely and efficiently calculating balances of cash flows is crucial for successful engineering economics analysis within construction project management. However, such balance calculation is challenged by mercurial conditions; e.g., individual cash flows may occur periodically, profit markups may be distributed evenly or unevenly, and the balance must consider the time value of money. These intricate phenomena can be modeled with singularity functions. Singularity functions perform customized case distinctions, which yield enormous modeling flexibility. Contributions to the body of knowledge are threefold: A new signal function is introduced to express the periodicity of incremental payments and compound interest in detail for both integer and noninteger periods. Outflows and inflows both explicitly consider the time value of money for accurate direct calculation of variable balances, which can identify breakeven points. All formulas are validated with worked examples. Future research can extend the new approach toward analyzing other phenomena, such as prompt payment discounts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | balance; cash flows; cost and schedule; engineering economics; singularity functions; time value of money |
| Index terms: | construction project management, modelling, compound interest, engineering economics, body of knowledge, cash flow, profit |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, economic analysis, knowledge management, project management theory and practice, financial management, financial analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here