Wang, D; Dai, F and Ning, X (2015) Risk assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in construction: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(6): 04015008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) have long been a primary cause of non-fatal injuries in construction. They involve sudden or continuous stresses on a worker's musculoskeletal system (e.g., muscles, tendons, ligaments, bones) and may impair the ability of the worker to perform his or her job, or even cause permanent disability. Although assessing exposure to risk factors of WMSDs has proven to be feasible to alleviate the incidence rate of this injury, the field remains underdeveloped because of a lack of knowledge among construction professionals regarding the enabling techniques and their performance and limits. This paper reviews the available techniques for WMSD risk assessments, summarizes their benefits and limitations, and identifies areas in which further studies are still needed. Current techniques are categorized into self-report, observation, direct measurement, and remote sensing assessment. Particular interests are revealed in the wearable-sensor and vision-based techniques within the construction community. This review helps the industry to better understand the severity of WMSDs and the related risks in construction. This review also provides the construction research community with a holistic view on available techniques, their limitations, and the need for research in achieving automatic assessments on construction sites.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction ergonomics; construction safety; labor and personnel issues; literature review; remote sensing; risk assessment; wearable sensors; work-related musculoskeletal disorders |
| Index terms: | personnel, injury, construction site, literature review, ergonomics, state of the art, exposure, construction safety, disability, construction professional, risk assessment, wearable sensor, remote sensing, risk factor, construction community |
| Subjects: | work location, research products and data, data analysis and analytics, research dissemination and communication, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, environmental hazards, environmental health, public and environmental health, management, professional development, financial risk, computer vision |
| Topics: | Site Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here