Overdue invoice management: Markov chain approach

Younes, B; Bouferguène, A; Al-Hussein, M and Yu, H (2015) Overdue invoice management: Markov chain approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(1): 04014062, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The gross domestic product (GDP) of the Canadian construction industry in 2012 amounted to $111 billion, all having been exchanged in the form of invoices. In fact, a typical construction company processes tens of thousands of invoices for payment annually. There are two significant challenges associated with this invoice processing: (1) process costs due to remuneration of the construction owner's highly paid personnel, and (2) the cost of delayed invoice payments, which is typically a cost absorbed by the contractor that is consequently added to the overall project cost. Ensuring on-time payment of invoices, even when funds are available, can be a challenging exercise because of variety, volume, and the unpredictable number of received invoices. These realities make overdue invoices a pressing problem to be addressed, which in the long term leads to loss in profit and damaged reputation for both contractors and owners. The research presented in this paper utilizes a cohort Markov model to evaluate invoice processing. It seeks to identify and rank bottlenecks to highlight and prioritize opportunities for process improvement, thereby leading to a null-overdue invoice-processing approach. Furthermore, given the stochastic nature of invoice processing, various probabilistic sensitivity analyses are proposed, including an empirical approach that can be used at the experimental design stage where data are either limited or unavailable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: invoice lead time; invoice processing improvement; Markov modeling; probabilistic sensitivity analysis; quantitative methods
Index terms: process improvement, personnel, sensitivity analysis, construction company, project cost, profit, quantitative method, gross domestic product, Markov chain, exercise, owner, experimental design, lead time, modelling, construction industry
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, economic analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, mathematical modelling, research design and methodology, organization, industry analysis, environmental hazards, project controls, sociology, management, economics
Topics: Human Resources, Time Control, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here