Abuwarda, Z and Hegazy, T (2016) Flexible activity relations to support optimum schedule acceleration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 06016004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In construction schedules, a logical relationship between two activities is specified by the relationship type and a fixed lag time. This rigid representation, however, does not consider the situation when two activities have a degree of flexibility in their relationship. Such flexibility, or soft relation, can be very beneficial as it provides a range of overlapping options that can be utilized in situations that require the schedule to be optimally accelerated. This paper thus proposes a formalization of a generic logical relationship (hard or soft) of any type (finish-to-start, etc.) between any two activities. Using the generic representation, modified activity start and finish time computations are presented to accommodate the overlaps associated with soft relations, and are used in a schedule-crashing model. The model determines the optimum combination of activity crashing and overlapping decisions that minimizes project cost without violating the resource constraints. The new activity relationship and crashing model are beneficial to both researchers and practitioners as they facilitate schedule optimization decisions for projects that exercise a good level of overlapping, such as fast-track projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constraint programming; cost and schedule; optimization; overlapping; resource constraints; schedule crashing |
| Index terms: | practitioner, crashing, constraint programming, resource constraint, computation, schedule acceleration, exercise, option, project cost |
| Subjects: | operations management, health behaviours and lifestyles, decision analysis, algorithms, practitioner, project controls, computational methods, economics |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Project Management, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here