Aljassmi, H; Han, S and Davis, S (2016) Analysis of the complex mechanisms of defect generation in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2): 04015063, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There have been numerous research efforts to minimize construction defects and a variety of suggestions have been provided. However, while all of these suggestions are valuable and have the potential to prevent defects, a construction company may have difficulty adopting them due to financial and practical constraints. Thus, this calls for the identification and characterization of the most influential causes of defects, in order to prioritize defect prevention strategies. To address this necessity, this paper aims to identify the most important causes of defects in terms of frequency, magnitude, and pathogenicity. For this goal, a questionnaire survey of 106 industry professionals was conducted to examine 30 causes of defects, collected through an extensive literature review. High frequency and high magnitude causes were identified and traced back to their initiating causes. Accordingly, the five most pathogenic causes were found to be (1) organizational culture, (2) time pressure and constraints, (3) workplace quality system, (4) financial constraints on operational expenses, and (5) inadequate employee training or learning opportunities. This paper is valuable to researchers in terms of developing a theoretical foundation to analyze and visualize the complex mechanisms of defect generation in construction. Further, this paper is of value to practitioners in terms of providing an effective tool to set defect prevention strategies and prioritize investment areas for quality improvements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | defect; failure; project pathogens network; project planning and design; quality; risk; social network analysis |
| Index terms: | construction defect, quality improvement, pathogen, prevention, survey, construction company, social network analysis, literature review, strategy, practitioner, questionnaire, construction project, project planning, organizational culture |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, contract obligations, project delivery, control systems, practitioner, data collection methods, organization, sociology, production management, financial risk, management, health risk and incident analysis, research methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here