Innovation in construction megaprojects

Brockmann, C; Brezinski, H and Erbe, A (2016) Innovation in construction megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016059, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry is often criticized for its lack of innovation. Yet, that same industry designs and builds the largest projects of the world - megaprojects. This discrepancy begs the question, whether lack of innovation is a valid description of the construction industry. A megaproject seems ideal to test the construction industry for its innovation potential. For the collection and analysis of data, longitudinal action research, combined with a case study approach, provides the required level of detail and an understanding of interdependencies. The BangNa Expressway in Thailand serves as the focal case; it is the largest bridge in the world. The following aspects are primary contributions to the stock of knowledge: we identify 58 innovations, some are product or construction technology innovations, others are within the technical, management, or contractual organization. This magnitude attests to the ability of the construction industry to innovate on a level not yet identified. The whole project is embedded in a system of interdependent innovations, and strings of incremental innovation lead to very important changes. There are many innovative features on the world level which different champions sponsored. The construction industry, with its bewildering diversity of products and services, provides results on a continuum from repetition to innovation, with megaprojects situated at the innovative end.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction innovation; construction materials and methods; megaproject; organizational innovation; process innovation; product innovation
Index terms: Thailand, construction material, construction technology, construction industry, case study, product innovation, construction innovation, organizational innovation, megaproject, action research, level of detail
Subjects: technical documentation, building materials, strategic project management, data collection methods, business, digital engineering, innovation studies, building construction, industry analysis, Geography
Topics: Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here