Chiang, Y H; Li, V J; Zhou, L; Wong, F and Lam, P (2016) Evaluating sustainable building-maintenance projects: Balancing economic, social, and environmental impacts in the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2): 06015003, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study investigates whether existing residential buildings can be repaired and maintained with alternative mixes of materials to maximize social, economic, or environmental benefits through a case study of a residential building repair and maintenance projects in Hong Kong. Based on optimization techniques, through a portfolio of materials two of the three objectives in building maintenance works can be achieved: employment generation, lifecycle cost reduction, and carbon emission reduction. These materials are different from the original ones used in the floors, walls, ceilings, waterproofing, and doors. The findings enhance the sustainability performance of the global building construction sector in overcoming the universal barriers to implementing energy-efficient buildings, namely, high initial cost, weak enforcement of government policies, and uncertainty of returns. The prototype model suggests that a portfolio of materials can be constructed to achieve two objectives at any given time, with the third objective acting as a constraint. The optimization techniques enable the global building construction sector to strike a balance among economic, social, and environmental benefits and constraints in maintenance works.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building maintenance; construction materials; construction materials and methods; optimization techniques |
| Index terms: | sustainable building, environmental impact, repair, cost reduction, building maintenance, building construction, prototype, government policy, construction material, lifecycle, enforcement, energy-efficient building, optimization technique, Hong Kong, residential building, case study, carbon emission, employment, sustainability performance |
| Subjects: | building materials, public policy, modelling and simulation, project delivery, data collection methods, construction type, environmental impact, climate science, building construction, management, sustainability assessment, maintenance engineering, algorithms, economics, Geography, sustainable design, health safety and environment, sustainable construction |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here