Du, J; Kim, B C and Zhao, D (2016) Cost performance as a stochastic process: EAC projection by Markov chain simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(6): 04016009, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Earned value analysis (EVA) has been widely used in the construction industry for cost prediction at completion. The EVA's accuracy of early cost projections is low since the method assumes static cost performance during construction. A project's cost performance is evidenced as a stochastic process. In an effort to improve the EVA's accuracy of early cost predictions, this work reports a modified method of Markovian simulation cost projection (MSCP). Based on Markov chain simulation, MSCP simulates the probability distribution of the cost performance indicators for each period of a project, and predicts the final cost using the summation of each simulated period cost. The MSCP method is demonstrated and validated through a case study of a real-world power plant project. Data analysis indicates that MSCP improves the prediction accuracy four times higher than EVA. Findings also suggest that MSCP is able to capture erratic changes of cost performance throughout a project's lifecycle and thus provides better EAC (estimate at completion) predictions and early warnings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; cost projection; earned value analysis; Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation; stochastic process |
| Index terms: | Monte Carlo simulation, power plant, probability distribution, case study, cost prediction, Markov chain, estimate, construction industry, lifecycle, accuracy, early warning, data analysis, cost performance, earned value analysis |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, professional development, financial risk, economics, project delivery, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation, mathematical modelling, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here