Conceptual estimation of construction costs using the multistep ahead approach

Dursun, O and Stoy, C (2016) Conceptual estimation of construction costs using the multistep ahead approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9): 04016038, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Providing accurate forecasts of construction costs at the conceptual phases of building projects is vital since they form an objective benchmark for the subsequent evaluation of project performance. Previous works adopted a conventional approach in which a restricted set of macro project determinants, which are available in the preplanning phase, was employed towards direct estimation of construction costs. Aiming to reduce the prediction error in conceptual estimates, the current study adopts a novel approach from the domain of forecasting. This multistep ahead (MSA) approach relies on the idea of using several cascaded estimations to predict future values. Accordingly, building element quantities were estimated as the first step. In the second step, estimated quantities were combined with the existing set of inputs to achieve a higher accuracy in construction cost prediction. In order to test the hypotheses of interest, 657 building projects from Germany were analyzed using linear regression and artificial neural network methods. Conclusive evidence suggests that the MSA approach significantly outperforms the prediction accuracy of the conventional practice. To the best of authors' investigation, the current study is the first to offer such a cascaded estimation approach. Therefore, further empirical evidence is necessary prior to generalizing applicability of the MSA approach in construction cost estimation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost and schedule; cost estimation; multistep ahead approach; neural networks; preplanning; regression
Index terms: evidence, investigation, estimate, cost estimating, neural network, artificial neural network, construction cost, Germany, estimation, forecasting, accuracy, determinant, project performance
Subjects: data collection methods, project management theory and practice, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, evaluation and assessment methods, professional development, Geography, modelling and simulation, risk assessment, artificial intelligence
Topics: Research Practice, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here