Prediction of total cost of construction project with dependent cost items

Firouzi, A; Yang, W and Li, C Q (2016) Prediction of total cost of construction project with dependent cost items. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(12): 04016072, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction projects are typically carried out in highly uncertain environments with the risk of cost and time overruns, and subsequent disputes between stakeholders. One of common risk factors is that most cost items of a project are dependent random variables. Thus, correlations between basic cost items need to be considered in predicting the total cost of the project. This paper intends to propose a generic copula-based Monte Carlo simulation method for prediction of construction projects' total costs with dependent cost items. An algorithm to generate the joint probability distribution function of correlated cost items is developed and two examples are presented to demonstrate the applicability of copulas in modeling construction costs as random variables. A merit of the proposed method is that it not only can incorporate all different types of distributions in one framework, but it also captures the best dependence structure between variables. This paper finds that different dependence structures can lead to different probability distributions of total cost. It also finds that the existing goodness of fit tests can be employed in choosing the best performing copula. The paper concludes that the copula-based Monte Carlo simulation method can predict total cost of construction projects with reasonable accuracy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Copula; cost and schedule; cost items; dependence structure; Monte Carlo simulation; probability distribution
Index terms: risk factor, modelling, time overrun, probability distribution, Monte Carlo simulation, construction cost, dispute, construction project, accuracy
Subjects: dispute resolution, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, financial and cost management, production management, professional development, project controls, environmental hazards, statistical analysis
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here