Gosling, J; Pero, M; Schoenwitz, M; Towill, D and Cigolini, R (2016) Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: An international perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016062, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Modularization involves breaking up a system into discrete chunks, which communicate with each other through standardized interfaces, rules, and specifications. It is a broad concept with various interpretations and meanings across research disciplines. The complexity and scope of a module is not captured sufficiently and clearly in the construction management and engineering literature, and the impact of modularization across project phases has not been fully explored and articulated. Therefore, the main question addressed in this paper relates to the inherent meaning of what is a module in the context of different phases of a building project. In addressing this question, this paper empirically investigates the use of modularity in 15 construction projects situated in Italy, Germany, Brazil, and the United Kingdom. The findings of this research suggest that a design-based and an operations-based perspective of modularity coexist, and that there is the need for an integrated view of modularity across the project lifecycle phases and for collaborative working between designers and site operators. To this aim, a unifying definition of a module in building projects is proposed along with a practical guide to help managers organize project activities for effective modularization. The actual cost analysis of the various modularization strategies provides an interesting avenue for future research. The template proposed also requires wider testing with a wider range of modules.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | modular; offsite; prefabrication; project planning and design |
| Index terms: | designer, specification, testing, actual cost, manager, modularity, prefabrication, construction project, meaning, project planning, Brazil, strategy, Germany, module, modularization, Italy, complexity, United Kingdom, project lifecycle |
| Subjects: | practitioner, contractual condition, profession, Geography, sociology, building construction, professional practice, project completion, design flexibility, financial and cost management, architectural elements, production management, management, systems engineering, control systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Project Management, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here