Kempton, J and Fergusson, S (2004) Potential of prefabricated pods to extend houses: Initial feasibility study for social housing. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
Current UK Government policies aim to provide affordable housing, expand housing provision in key geographical areas and achieve the Egan principles. This has raised the profile and potential utility of modular and prefabricated buildings and components. Social housing also faces its own particular problems; including government polices that reduce the rental income from certain properties, an ageing stock profile, low demand for properties in certain areas, and various National standards for housing including Decent Homes and Affordable Warmth. All these issues can have the effect of lowering income and increasing expenditure. The need for innovation to sustain financial viability is therefore paramount. With these factors in mind, an initial feasibility study was undertaken to establish whether prefabricated 'extension pods' could be utilised to increase the size of existing dwellings for Touchstone Housing Association based in the UK- typically Victorian terraced properties, to produce a cost saving over traditionally built extensions, and increase housing demand. This is of course different from erecting a complete dwelling, and raises particular issues. The results of the feasibility study show that their may be scope for the use of the prefabricated pods, but several problems need to be resolved. Particular problems include the transportation and handling of the pods, the interfaces between the pods and the existing dwellings, assurances over the whole life costs of the pods and customer (i.e. tenants of the dwellings) acceptance. We call on the construction industry to consider the potentially large market in social housing and work with the sector to overcome the barriers to the use of prefabricated extension pods.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | house extensions; prefabrication; social housing |
| Index terms: | housing provision, housing association, housing, social housing, prefabrication, construction industry, prefabricated building, cost saving, affordable housing, income, government policy, whole life cost, tenant, financial viability, face, feasibility study |
| Subjects: | housing and residential development, building construction, industry analysis, financial analysis, economics, psychology, institutional client, design stages, public policy, business management, economic analysis, construction type, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here