Detection model for unbalanced pricing in construction projects: A risk-based approach

Hyari, K H; Tarawneh, Z S and Katkhuda, H N (2016) Detection model for unbalanced pricing in construction projects: A risk-based approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(12): 04016078, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Unbalanced pricing of bid line items is considered an undesirable practice by owners and may lead to rejection of the bid on the basis of nonresponsiveness to the bidding regulations. This paper presents the development of a detection model to help owners detect objectionable unbalanced bidding. The proposed model quantifies the risk afforded by deviations of the actual quantities of work from the estimated quantities of the bid line items. The proposed model also considers the impact of multiple uncertainties in line item quantities on the owner's total project cost based on the unit prices submitted by all the bidders for the project. Historical deviations from the estimated quantities during previous construction projects are used as an indicator of future fluctuations in the estimated quantities. The proposed model allows uncertainty in the quantities of work to be incorporated into the bid evaluation stage to assess each bidder's likelihood of being the truly lowest bidder (i.e., yielding the lowest cost to the owner). An application example, based on actual bid results submitted to the California Department of Transportation, was used to illustrate the effectiveness of the model in detecting objectionable unbalanced bids. The model is expected to provide much needed support for owners in the bid evaluation stage and to reduce the controversy around unbalanced pricing because it targets material unbalancing rather than the whole practice of unbalanced pricing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bid pricing; competitive bidding; construction projects; contracting; detection model; skewed bidding; unbalanced pricing
Index terms: project cost, unbalanced bidding, lowest cost, regulation, owner, bidding, bidder, competitive bidding, bid evaluation, effectiveness, deviation, construction project, pricing
Subjects: economic analysis, production management, sociology, tendering, bidding, performance management, political science, economics, financial and cost management
Topics: Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here