Ioannou, P G and Yang, I T (2016) Repetitive scheduling method: Requirements, modeling, and implementation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5): 04016002, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Projects with repeating activities, such as multistory buildings and highways, present unique scheduling challenges. This paper presents the necessary requirements that scheduling systems should address to meet the needs and complexities of repetitive projects in practice. The repetitive scheduling method (RSM) provides a unified scheduling framework that applies to all types of repetitive projects. In RSM, projects are classified as discrete (vertical) or continuous (horizontal or linear) and then as uniform and nonuniform, depending on whether progress is measured using a counting scale or a dominant-attribute scale. RSM modeling elements include three types of activities (line, block, and bar) and 10 types of relationships (links) between activities. RP2, a computer program developed by the authors to validate the proposed scheduling approach, is used to develop the production diagrams and tabular reports of the target schedule for a complex of four-story apartment buildings for a low-income housing project. Sufficient detail is provided so that the project and its target schedule can be used to validate future research and to verify other systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | horizontal construction; line of balance; linear construction; planning; repeating activities; repetitive project; repetitive scheduling method; scheduling; vertical construction |
| Index terms: | complexity, repetitive scheduling, line of balance, scheduling, apartment building, linear construction, computer program, implementation, modelling, repetitive project, low-income housing |
| Subjects: | construction type, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, operations research, production management, software systems, systems engineering, housing and residential development, building construction |
| Topics: | Time Control, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Procurement, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here