Li, S; Cai, H and Kamat, V R (2016) Integrating natural language processing and spatial reasoning for utility compliance checking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(12): 04016074, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Underground utility incidents, such as utility conflicts and utility strikes, result in time and cost overruns in construction projects, property damages, environmental pollution, personnel injuries, and fatalities. A main cause of recurrent utility incidents is the noncompliance with the spatial configurations between utilities and their surroundings. Utility specifications usually contain textual descriptions of the spatial configurations. However, detection of spatial defects, according to the textual descriptions, is difficult and time consuming. This deficiency is because of the lack of spatial cognition in many rule-checking systems to process massive amounts of data. This study aims to automate utility compliance checking by integrating natural language processing (NLP) and spatial reasoning. NLP algorithm translates the textual descriptions of spatial configurations into computer-processable spatial rules. Spatial reasoning executes the extracted spatial rules following a logical order in a geographical information system (GIS) to identify noncompliance. The intellectual contribution of this study is twofold. First, complex spatial rules are retrieved automatically from textual data with their hierarchies classified, which provides the inputs and indicates the sequence of rule execution in spatial reasoning. Second, semantic spatial relations are modeled on the basis of their metric and topological implications, enabling the automatic execution of multiple spatial rules. Experiments were conducted to test this framework. The average precision, recall, and combination of the two (F-measure) achieved by the NLP algorithm for extracting spatial rules are 87.88%, 79.09%, and 83.25%, respectively. In addition, the spatial reasoning mechanism also was found to be a powerful tool for compliance checking under various scenarios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | compliance checking; geographical information system; information technologies; natural language processing; spatial reasoning; underground utility |
| Index terms: | pollution, cost overrun, utilities, fatalities, compliance, reasoning, personnel, injury, specification, damages, experiment, construction project, cognition, information system, spatial configuration, information technology |
| Subjects: | information systems, environmental health, cognitive psychology, health conditions and diseases, contractual condition, health safety and environment, production management, health risk and incident analysis, management, architectural design, financial and cost management, computing systems, dispute resolution, construction type, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here