Li, T H Y; Thomas Ng, S and Skitmore, M (2016) Modeling multi-stakeholder multi-objective decisions during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A decision rule approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(3): 04015087, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Major infrastructure and construction (MIC) projects are those with significant traffic or environmental impact, of strategic and regional significance and high sensitivity. The decision-making process of schemes of this type is becoming ever more complicated, especially with the increasing number of stakeholders involved and their growing tendency to defend their own varied interests. Failing to address and meet the concerns and expectations of stakeholders may result in project failures. To avoid this necessitates a systematic participatory approach to facilitate decision making. Though numerous decision models have been established in previous studies (e.g., ELECTRE methods, the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process) their applicability in the decision process during stakeholder participation in contemporary MIC projects is still uncertain. To resolve this, the decision rule approach is employed for modeling multi-stakeholder multi-objective project decisions. Through this, the result is obtained naturally according to the rules accepted by any stakeholder involved. In this sense, consensus is more likely to be achieved because the process is more convincing and the result is more easily accepted by all concerned. Appropriate rules, comprehensive enough to address multiple objectives while straightforward enough to be understood by multiple stakeholders, are set for resolving conflict and facilitating consensus during the project decision process. The West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) project is used as a demonstration case and a focus group meeting is conducted in order to confirm the validity of the model established. The results indicate that the model is objective, reliable and practical enough to cope with real world problems. Finally, a suggested future research agenda is provided.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict analysis; consensus building; major infrastructure and construction projects; multi-stakeholder multi-objective decision making; public participation; quantitative methods |
| Index terms: | decision-making process, decision process, validity, becoming, project failure, modelling, analytic network process, stakeholder participation, research agenda, consensus building, participatory approach, focus group, public participation, decision-making, construction project, quantitative method, environmental impact |
| Subjects: | philosophical process, decision-making and optimization, collaborative management, research management, decision analysis, production management, participation process, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, environmental impact, community and social dimensions, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, project completion |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here