Lu, W; Ye, M; Flanagan, R and Ye, K (2016) Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business: Trends and prospects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1): 04015053, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There is increasing sophistication in corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures by international construction companies (ICCs). Nevertheless, a systematic analysis of the trends and prospects is yet to appear. This study fills that knowledge gap by providing an understanding of the idiosyncrasies of CSR disclosures and by offering suggestions for future reporting exercises. By examining the top fifty ICCs' CSR/sustainability reports using content analysis, it is found that the more negative effects a company may have, the more remedial strategies it will disclose in a CSR report. ICCs from economically more developed countries maintain a high level of CSR disclosures, while their counterparts from developing countries have caught up in this CSR cause. As a way to improve the consistency and integrity of disclosed information, ICCs are increasingly adopting CSR reporting guidance frameworks and using third-party assurances. CSR disclosures present a high degree of uniformity while they also show nuanced and intriguing diversity. This research helps understand comprehensively the trends of CSR disclosures in the international construction. It will help ICCs extrapolate their future CSR reporting exercises.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | content analysis; corporate social responsibility; disclosure; international construction business; organizational issues; prospects; trends |
| Index terms: | integrity, exercise, corporate social responsibility, organizational issue, international construction, content analysis, strategy, developing country, developed country |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, business, strategic management, health behaviours and lifestyles, management, development economics, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, International Construction, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here