Lv, X and El-Gohary, N M (2016) Discovering context-specific integration practices for integrating NEPA into statewide and metropolitan project planning processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016056, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
When the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and the transportation project planning process are not streamlined, the NEPA process may lead to duplication of work and project delays. This paper presents research work in discovering state-suitable integration practices for integrating NEPA into statewide and metropolitan transportation project planning processes for the state of Illinois. The discovery of practices was based on an analytical review of existing integration guidelines and efforts in other states and using a survey of experts from relevant federal, state, and metropolitan planning, regulatory, and resource agencies. Two types of integration practices were identified: process-oriented and collaboration-oriented integration practices. The selected practices were integrated into existing transportation project planning processes and formalized into an integrated process flow with detailed implementation guidance. The integrated process was validated through a second expert survey. The validation results indicate that the integrated process, including its implementation detail and process representation, provides appropriate guidance for integrating NEPA into transportation project planning processes in Illinois. The implementation of the integrated process would improve interagency coordination and communication, enable early identification of potential environmental issues, reduce duplication of effort, and enhance project delivery in terms of time and cost.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; environmental review; national environmental policy act; process integration; project planning and design |
| Index terms: | environmental issue, transportation project, survey, collaboration, integration, validation, environmental policy, agency, project planning, project delay, planning process, implementation, coordination, project delivery |
| Subjects: | environmental issues, control systems, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, project delivery, public policy, professional development, management, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls, organizational analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability, Governance, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here