Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks

Nguyen, L D; Tran, D Q and Chandrawinata, M P (2016) Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9): 04016041, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Although the construction industry has shown significant improvements in safety performance over the past 30 years, falls are still a leading cause of fatalities and serious injuries. Previous studies have focused on identifying factors affecting the risk of falls, but remained silent on investigating the evidential relationships among these factors to better prevent fall accidents. This research proposes a Bayesian network (BN) based approach to diagnose the accident risk of working at heights. The proposed approach consists of a conceptual and generic model with a protocol for assessing the risk of falls and a computational module. The generic BN model was developed on the basis of an extensive review and evaluation of causal factors leading to falls. The computational module was developed on the basis of Bayes' rule for inference to customize model input and job site characteristics. The results of the proposed approach provide probabilities associated with different states of safety risk. Additionally, sensitivity analysis allows practitioners to identify appropriate preventive actions and safety strategies to reduce risk of fall. The proposed approach was verified and tested with a construction operation in a condo-hotel project. This study contributes to the construction safety body of knowledge by providing an effective quantitative risk assessment tool to predict the safety risk of falls from heights. Researchers and practitioners may customize the model to assess and benchmark the fall risk for different operations in the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accidents; Bayesian analysis; quantitative methods; risk management; safety
Index terms: construction safety, body of knowledge, safety performance, quantitative method, practitioner, strategy, Bayesian analysis, injury, sensitivity analysis, fatalities, construction industry, risk assessment, hotel, risk management, module, falls, construction operation, bayesian network
Subjects: financial risk, health risk and incident analysis, management, architectural elements, environmental hazards, environmental health, statistical analysis, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, probabilistic model, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, construction type, risk assessment, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management
Topics: Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here