Critical success factors for commissioning and start-up of capital projects

O'Connor, J T; Choi, J O and Winkler, M (2016) Critical success factors for commissioning and start-up of capital projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016060, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Commissioning and start-up (CSU) must be accomplished before a facility can initiate initial operations and begin meeting commercial objectives. Actions necessary for successful CSU are often not well planned or executed, resulting in poor CSU performance. Recognizing this significant shortfall, the purpose of this study is to determine critical activities necessary to increase the likelihood of successful CSU performance on capital projects. Utilizing input from CSU experts, objective data collection, and subsequent data analysis, 16 critical success factors (CSFs) were identified through this research. Further elements developed include CSF's timing of CSF implementation, support of safety and quality, and current frequency of CSF achievement. The researchers recommend the industry to pay particular attention to these six laggard CSFs: CSU value recognition, adequate funding for CSU, CSU leadership continuity, system milestone acceptance criteria and deliverables, CSU systems engineering during front-end engineering design (FEED), and systems-focus in detailed design. Capital project team members (representing both owners and contractors) and researchers involved in the planning and implementation of facility CSU will benefit from the results.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: capital facilities; commissioning; critical success factors; industrial projects; project planning and design; start-up
Index terms: systems engineering, owner, capital project, funding, engineering design, implementation, data analysis, commissioning, project planning, critical success factor
Subjects: control systems, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, strategic project management, design process, sociology, completion, systems engineering
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here