Unified framework for construction project integration

Ospina-Alvarado, A; Castro-Lacouture, D and Roberts, J S (2016) Unified framework for construction project integration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(7): 4016019, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Moving the construction industry towards a more-integrated approach to project delivery could improve its overall performance. The aim of this paper is to develop a unified framework for project integration by identifying the critical success attribute and different levels of attribute importance, and by determining if there are major differences among the perceptions of survey respondents depending on their industry role. The survey sample (N=264) was composed of industry practitioners in the United States. The framework was developed using the Thurstone Scaling Method of Successive Interval Procedure; In addition, this method was complemented and validated using correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). According to the perceptions of respondents, 19 of the 45 attributes under study were identified as critical for successfully achieving project integration. Four other categories of importance were identified. There were minor differences found between the perceptions that different project participants had in regard to the importance of the different attributes for achieving project integration, leading to the conclusion that the perceptions of respondents in regard to this matter are very homogeneous within the context of the 45 Integration Attributes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: organizational issues; project delivery; variance analysis
Index terms: survey, United States, integrated approach, variance analysis, integration, construction project, cluster analysis, practitioner, correlation analysis, variance, construction industry, project delivery, scaling, organizational issue
Subjects: contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, practitioner, data collection methods, business, organization, industry analysis, statistical analysis, organizational analysis, measurement and scaling, production management, Geography
Topics: Organizational Design, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here