A probabilistic-based method to determine optimum size of project buffer in construction schedules

Poshdar, M; González, V A; Raftery, G M; Orozco, F; Romeo, J S and Forcael, E (2016) A probabilistic-based method to determine optimum size of project buffer in construction schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10): 04016046, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Buffers are used to deal with the detrimental impacts of uncertainty on projects. However, methods for the allocation of buffers often provide single unique solutions, which are inefficient in the multiobjective decision-making environment of construction. This paper discusses a probabilistic-based buffer allocation method (PBAL), which enables the final decision on buffer size to be made by the project planners based on their preferences about project completion time. It investigates the construction projects where each activity starts as early as possible. Accordingly, the decision involves determining the size of time buffer at the end of the project network. The accuracy of the results is subjected to approximation and numerical errors in the mathematical models among others. Most buffer allocation heuristics for projects have approximation errors and simulation-based techniques introduce numerical errors by their iterative sampling calculation approach. PBAL can minimize these errors by supporting important details of modeling the production in activities, and preserving these details when modeling at the project level. The PBAL capability to minimize mathematical modeling errors and its accuracy has been successfully tested using the records from ten construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytical techniques; buffers; network analysis; process variability; project planning and design; scheduling
Index terms: heuristic, network analysis, variability, modelling, sampling, planner, buffer, mathematical modelling, accuracy, project network, mathematical model, scheduling, time buffer, project planning, preference, completion time, construction project, decision-making
Subjects: operations research, analytical methods, project planning, data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, control systems, decision analysis, project controls, statistical analysis, decision-making and reasoning, financial risk, professional development, production management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here