An exploratory analysis of perceived risk among construction workers in three Spanish-speaking countries

Rodríguez-Garzón, I; Martínez-Fiestas, M; Delgado-Padial, A and Lucas-Ruiz, V (2016) An exploratory analysis of perceived risk among construction workers in three Spanish-speaking countries. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016066, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction is one of the most hazardous industries. This study analyzes occupational risk and focuses specifically on the question of perception of risk based on a sample of construction workers from three countries (Spain, Peru, and Nicaragua) that, in spite of sharing the same language (Spanish), have different socioeconomic levels. The model used for this study is based on the psychometric paradigm. The results of the survey using a questionnaire indicate that the sample population can be separated into two different clusters, each characterized either by a high or a low perception of risk. The authors then attempted to establish a link between the level of perceived risk and different socio-demographic variables. The outcome is that only the training variable significantly altered the perception of risk. This finding, as well as various other aspects of risk perception from the different nations, are discussed. The conclusions of this study provide interesting guidelines for risk management for the construction industry, such as, for example, the increase of the number of hours of worker safety and health training or that the nationality the workers does not appear to affect worker risk perception.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cross-cultural; labor and personnel issues; occupational risk; perceived risk; prevention; psychometric paradigm; risk; risk perception; safety; safety management
Index terms: survey, demographic variable, risk perception, Peru, personnel, safety management, questionnaire, population, Spain, Nicaragua, prevention, construction industry, construction worker, risk management, paradigm
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, environmental hazards, industry analysis, demography, occupational health and safety management, financial risk, Geography, management, education and knowledge transfer
Topics: Urban Studies, Human Resources, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here