Float types in construction spatial scheduling

Said, H M M and Lucko, G (2016) Float types in construction spatial scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(12): 04016077, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Earlier studies investigated spatial scheduling to link schedules of construction activities to workspace availability and constraints. However, previous models lacked the ability to quantify criticality in a manner similar to the critical path method. Previous spatial scheduling models did not provide seamless integration with site logistics planning of material staging and temporary facilities. This paper therefore extracts various float types that can exist in a spatial schedule. Three activity float metrics are defined using singularity functions: shift, rate, and combined floats. An algorithm is established to generate space float contours for a construction site. A validation example demonstrates the new float concepts and space float contours. This research makes two contributions to body of knowledge of construction scheduling. First, activity float metrics expand the capabilities of spatial scheduling models to assess the criticality of activities. Second, the concept of space float enables a direct integration between scheduling and other project management tasks like site layout, material logistics, and trades coordination.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: floats; mathematical modeling; singularity functions; space scheduling
Index terms: construction site, scheduling, site layout, body of knowledge, site logistics, critical path method, integration, validation, construction activity, workspace, construction scheduling, project management, coordination, mathematical modelling
Subjects: knowledge management, construction operations, site logistics, analytical methods, operations research, work location, operations management, project management theory and practice, professional development, management, project controls, organizational analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here