Nondestructive testing procedure to evaluate the load-carrying capacity of concrete anchors

Saleem, M; Al-Kutti, W A; Al-Akhras, N M and Haider, H (2016) Nondestructive testing procedure to evaluate the load-carrying capacity of concrete anchors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5): 04015104, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Concrete anchors are extensively used in the construction industry. Their applications range from erecting permanent objects such as sign poles, direction signs, lighting poles, and so on, to temporary support structures. Several destructive testing equipment types exist in the industry that can be used to evaluate the load-carrying capacity of concrete anchors. However, no nondestructive testing method has been proposed that can estimate their load-carrying capacity. This study develops a new relationship between the pull-out load-carrying capacity, P, of concrete anchors and Schmidt hammer rebound value, R. It was observed from experimentation that the load-carrying capacity of the concrete anchors depends on the embedment length, anchor diameter, concrete strength, and anchor alignment. The effect of anchor alignment was also observed during experimentation, and anchors with ill alignment of more than 5% can lead to lower load-carrying capacity. In addition, it is also possible to identify the ill-aligned concrete anchor and anchor bolt installed in poor quality concrete using the test results. A new type of anchor cage is also developed and presented in the research work that can be used to conduct the pull-out testing using the universal testing machine, eradicating the need for separate pull-out testing devices. The 8-, 10-, and 12-mm diameter concrete anchors were studied, keeping constant the embedment length and concrete strength. The pull-out load strength versus rebound value relationship for each diameter anchor is presented with a co-relationship of more than 90%.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: capacity evaluation; concrete anchors; construction materials and methods; load-carrying strength; nondestructive testing; rebound number; schmidt hammer
Index terms: construction material, testing, construction industry, estimate, anchor, experiment
Subjects: geotechnical engineering, industry analysis, data collection methods, building materials, financial and cost management, professional practice
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here