Simulation-based assessment of workers' muscle fatigue and its impact on construction operations

Seo, J; Lee, S and Seo, J (2016) Simulation-based assessment of workers' muscle fatigue and its impact on construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11): 04016063, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction workers are frequently exposed to excessive physical demands due to repetitive lifting and material handling while performing tasks. Consequently, many construction workers suffer from a significant level of muscle fatigue that may negatively impact a project's performance. Thus, evaluating the level of muscle fatigue prior to work and implementing appropriate interventions to reduce physical demands will help to prevent adverse effects of workers' fatigue on construction operations. Even though several research efforts have suggested methodologies to evaluate muscle fatigue, the extent to which workers' muscle fatigue would affect construction performance has not yet been fully studied. To address this issue, a simulation-based framework is proposed to estimate physical demands and corresponding muscle fatigue, and thus to quantitatively evaluate the impact of muscle fatigue during construction operations. Specifically, physical demands from a planned operation modeled using discrete event simulation (DES) are estimated through biomechanical analyses. Then, the proposed dynamic fatigue models estimate the level of muscle fatigue of each worker as a function of the estimated physical demands. Workers' strategies to mitigate muscle fatigue, such as taking voluntary rests, are, in turn, modeled in the DES to understand how muscle fatigue affects time and cost performance of the planned operation. As a proof of concept, a case study on masonry work was performed to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed framework, describing the need for taking into account muscle fatigue for operational planning due to possible excessive physical demands. The results from the case study indicate that excessive physical demands beyond workers' capabilities result in reduction of time and cost performance. The proposed framework helps to better understand workers' response to physical demands by adding workers' capabilities as changing variables into traditional DES approaches, enabling pro-active management of human resources. Ultimately, the framework, which combines conventional interests on optimized operations in terms of time and cost with those of ergonomics, provides opportunities to take into account both workers' health and work performance in early design stages.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biomechanical analysis; construction operation; muscle fatigue; quantitative methods; simulation
Index terms: fatigue, strategy, cost performance, material handling, lifting, quantitative method, methodology, ergonomics, human resource, construction operation, construction performance, case study, discrete event simulation, early design stage, work performance, estimate, construction worker
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, management, economics, research methods, design process, modelling and simulation, operations management, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, performance assessment, product delivery, financial and cost management, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here