Sierra, L A; Pellicer, E and Yepes, V (2016) Social sustainability in the lifecycle of Chilean public infrastructure. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5): 05015020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
To enhance concern for the social aspects of sustainability and to delineate the criteria to be considered at each stage of the lifecycle of an infrastructure, this paper aims to determine the relevance of a set of criteria that evaluate social sustainability throughout the lifecycle of a public civil infrastructure. This research presents the results of a case study applying the Delphi method to 24 Chilean experts consulted in a series of three rounds. In addition, binomial statistical tests and Kendall's coefficient were used to show the convergence of the experts. Thus, it was identified that of 36 initial criteria assessed at each stage of the lifecycle, the consideration of 20 is required at the design stage, 29 at the construction stage, 33 during operation, and 27 at demolition. The most relevant criteria, per lifecycle stage, were Stakeholder Participation (design and demolition stages), External Local Population (design stage), Internal Human Resources (construction and demolition stages), Macro-Social Action of Socioenvironmental Activities (construction stage), and Macro-Social Action of Socioeconomic Activities (operation stage).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; Chile; Delphi; infrastructure; lifecycle; project planning and design; social sustainability |
| Index terms: | statistical test, case study, stakeholder participation, social sustainability, public infrastructure, Delphi method, population, human resource, Chile, social aspect, construction and demolition, design stage, lifecycle, project planning |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, professional practice, management, project delivery, data collection methods, demography, infrastructure and transport systems, control systems, waste management, sociology, Geography, statistical analysis, community and social dimensions |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Design Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Human Resources, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here