Singhaputtangkul, N and Zhao, X (2016) Applying a fuzzy consensus scheme to enhance the group decision making of a building envelope design team. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(8): 4016025, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study applies a fuzzy consensus scheme integrated with a multicriteria decision making method and fuzzy set theory to mitigate groupthink and disagreements among members of a building envelope design team. This fuzzy consensus scheme consists of freezing conditions and a standardized procedure to govern group decision making. The study employs a case study as a research design to test effectiveness of the fuzzy consensus scheme in mitigating groupthink and disagreements among the building design team members. In the case study, the design team is engaged and then tasked to apply the fuzzy consensus scheme when assessing different building envelope designs of a representative building project. A semi-structured interview is conducted to collect perspectives of the design team members regarding the effectiveness of the fuzzy consensus scheme applied in the case study in relation to their previous experience in similar actual projects. Results from the case study suggest that the fuzzy consensus scheme is useful in promoting group cohesiveness and generation of a variety of decision solutions. The scheme also assists the team members to express their opinions, listen to each other voices, and seek the optimal solutions that everyone in the team agrees with. These as a whole help mitigate both groupthink and disagreements among the team members. The main contributions of this study lie in the achievement of more effective group decision making and agreed design solutions. Future studies can incorporate the fuzzy consensus scheme into decision support tools to promote integration among project team members in several project development phases.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design team; fuzzy consensus scheme; fuzzy set theory; group decision making; project planning and design |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, building envelope, research design, freezing, decision support, future study, fuzzy set theory, decision-making, integration, interview, project development, building design, design team, case study, project team, group decision making, project planning |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, architectural elements, environmental science, decision-making and optimization, control systems, performance management, project delivery, risk assessment, data collection methods, research design and methodology, architectural design, decision analysis, professional practice |
| Topics: | Project Management, Quality Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here