Siu, M F F; Lu, M and Abourizk, S (2016) Resource supply-demand matching scheduling approach for construction workface planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1): 04015048, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper discusses a novel approach for resource-based scheduling that builds upon existing analytical models to achieve practical allocation of resources that are constrained by supply and demand. The approach facilitates workface planning to allocate work to individual craft persons. The main contribution of the work is advancement of the current scheduling practice of workface planning by (1) generalizing the resource supply-demand matching problem (RSDMP); and (2) formalizing the RSDMP scheduling approach for planning resource workflows which consists of (a) the mathematical model, (b) a two-stage optimization approach, and (c) innovative use of a resource-activity interaction table. The result is an optimum resource-constrained schedule providing the shortest project duration with the leanest resource supply. The optimum resource requirement is identified between the lower and upper bounds of the resource supply limit, thus ensuring the site's spatial and safety requirements. The optimum resource workflows of individual craft persons are presented to facilitate the project execution at the workface level. To illustrate the approach, an example adapted from a classic textbook is used. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on a practical level, an oil refinery turnaround project including input data and relevant information prepared for workface planning is used. As a result of the RSDMP analysis, the optimum plan obtained is resource-loaded, practically feasible, and workface executable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | linear programming; optimization; project scheduling; quantitative methods; resource demand; resource matching; resource supply; workface planning |
| Index terms: | interaction, duration, effectiveness, linear programming, supply and demand, turnaround project, analytical model, workflow, quantitative method, upper bound, scheduling, mathematical model, project scheduling |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, operations research, data analysis and analytics, management, theoretical framing, performance management, algorithms, project rescue, probability and distributions, project controls, market analysis, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here