Tsehayae, A A and Fayek, A R (2016) Developing and optimizing context-specific fuzzy inference system-based construction labor productivity models. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(7): 4016017, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction labor productivity (CLP) is affected by numerous context-sensitive influencing variables made up of subjective and objective factors, practices, and work sampling proportions (WSPs), which cause complex variability. Modeling CLP is challenging because for any given context, the complex impacts of multiple variables have to be considered simultaneously, without sacrificing accuracy or interpretability. Such challenges are addressed in this paper through the development of a methodology that explicitly represents context in CLP modeling and optimizes context-specific CLP models in order to improve accuracy. In addition, interpretable, fuzzy inference system (FIS)-based, and context-specific CLP models have been developed for the purpose of modeling concrete pouring activity. The performance of the context-specific CLP models is then compared with a generic CLP model, which is developed by combining the context-specific data sets. The results of the investigation showed that the key variables vary between the studied contexts and that the respective context-specific models have better prediction accuracy than the generic one. This study contributes to the body of knowledge in construction project management by demonstrating the essential role of context in the CLP model development process using context attributes, which provide a useful approach for characterizing existing CLP models and facilitate the use and adaptation of existing CLP models in new project contexts. In addition, this study presents a series of highly interpretable, context-specific CLP models to predict labor productivity in various building project contexts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | craft productivity; fuzzy set theory; labor and personnel issues; modeling |
| Index terms: | methodology, body of knowledge, model development, fuzzy inference, personnel, accuracy, labour productivity, sampling, construction project management, investigation, construction labour, variability, modelling, adaptation, fuzzy set theory, productivity |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, decision-making and optimization, research methods, management, professional development, project management theory and practice, analytical methods, knowledge management, user focus, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Human Resources, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here