Vereen, S C; Rasdorf, W and Hummer, J E (2016) Development and comparative analysis of construction industry labor productivity metrics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(7): 4016020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction industry labor productivity is an important metric that provides feedback about industry level trends and improvements. However, labor productivity for the construction industry has historically been elusive to define and determine both qualitatively and quantitatively. Existing research studies have provided different methods to calculate productivity at a variety of levels (activity, project, industry), but none proved universally satisfying. This paper presents a new metric for quantifying productivity that was developed using RSMeans Building Construction Cost Data, which is a source that is reliable, repeatable, and developed from consistent and accurate data sources. The metric was developed using labor and cost information from a sample of typical construction activities. The study results showed a slightly sporadic, but consistent productivity decline in both output per labor hour and per dollar cost from 1990 through 2008. Other metrics were selected from existing research studies and sources for a comparative analysis against the new metric, which revealed varying trends across metrics on the basis of varying input data and sources. The paper presents the new metric, which has value in that it allows construction professionals to analyze industry level productivity by means of a generally used and consistently published reference manual.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labor; labor and personnel issues; productivity |
| Index terms: | building construction, comparative analysis, personnel, construction industry, cost data, construction professional, labour productivity, construction activity, productivity, cost information |
| Subjects: | construction operations, data analysis and analytics, professional development, accounting and finance, management, industry analysis, building construction |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here