Sociotechnical systems of fatal electrical injuries in the construction industry

Zhao, D; McCoy, A P; Kleiner, B M; Smith-Jackson, T L and Liu, G (2016) Sociotechnical systems of fatal electrical injuries in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1): 04015056, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry experiences the greatest proportion of workplace electrical injuries globally. Much research effort has gone toward analyzing this phenomenon, yet a majority of which focused on isolated elements while ignored the work system. Modern work systems are complex, within which humans interact with technology, social structures, and environments. Outcomes (including accidents and injuries) resulting from such a complex system are not attained by any system element in isolation. As a result, effective risk management requires the control over the whole sociotechnical system (STS). This work demonstrates such an effort in investigating STSs. The work uses a triangulation approach in examining construction-fatality reports. The findings identify three typical STSs, reveal their system weaknesses, and provide remedial recommendations. The work contributes to the knowledge body of risk management, electrical safety, and research methodologies. The introduced triangulation approach in injury analysis and intervention is grounded in the broad concept of workplace safety, namely, organizational, social, political, and psychological contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: electrical injury; electrocution; labor and personnel issues; latent class; macroergonomics; multiple correspondence; risk management; sociotechnical system; workplace safety
Index terms: workplace safety, personnel, injury, triangulation, complex system, research methodology, risk management, social structure, construction industry
Subjects: risk assessment, research design and methodology, management, social theory, health conditions and diseases, occupational health, industry analysis, systems engineering
Topics: Risk Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here