Al-Bayati, A J; Abudayyeh, O; Fredericks, T and Butt, S E (2017) Managing cultural diversity at U.S. Construction sites: Hispanic workers' perspectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9): 04017064, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Communication on construction sites is crucial for improving overall construction performance. Cultural barriers influence the clarity of communication between construction supervisors and Hispanic workers on U.S. construction sites, which affects safety performance. In this study, Hispanic workers' perspectives regarding active cultural differences (ACD) were collected, analyzed, and compared to supervisors' perspectives and responses that were reported earlier. The results confirmed the existence of three active cultural differences: high power distance, collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance. Although the goal of the study was primarily to investigate active cultural differences, the results revealed additional important factors that affect Hispanic construction workers, such as daily work conditions, the effectiveness of government agencies' regulations, workers' legal status, and reporting nonsevere injuries. Very few, if any, empirical studies have focused on cultural diversity on U.S. construction sites. Therefore this study provides a meaningful understanding of the nature and influence of cultural differences, which in turn helps construction supervisors manage their diverse workforce as well as aids future research studies that are focused on cultural diversity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | active culture difference; hispanic workers; labor and personnel issues; leading indicator; safety management; the construction industry |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, empirical study, supervisor, construction worker, construction industry, construction performance, regulation, safety performance, safety management, injury, government agency, personnel, construction site, cultural difference |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, cross-cultural studies, industry analysis, administrative law, political science, management, performance management, research methods, work location, performance assessment, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Governance, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Quality Management, International Construction, Legal Issues, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here