Safety communication networks: Females in small work crews

Allison, L and Kaminsky, J (2017) Safety communication networks: Females in small work crews. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8): 04017050, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction workers experience one of the highest workplace injury and fatality rates in the United States. Recent research has shown that worker demographics such as language affect safety communication in small work crews. Noting the lack of gender diversity among construction workers, this research extends this past work by exploring how gender impacts work crew safety communication using social network analysis (SNA). The data, collected in transportation construction work zones in Washington State, show females have significantly (p≤0.05) lower amounts of in-degree (incoming ties) and in-closeness (distance for information to travel) than males in mixed-gender crews. Furthermore, mixed-gender crews have lower formal density and higher informal density than all-male crews. Practically speaking, this research shows that mixed-gender crews have different safety communication patterns than the more homogenous all-male crews. In order to understand the specific connections between the communication patterns and crew safety performance, safety professionals should track incidents, near misses, and hazards at the crew level. Furthermore, to create more cohesive safety communication, project managers, superintendents, and supervisors should foster communication cultures that are inclusive of all members.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; female; gender; labor and personnel issues; safety; social networks
Index terms: social network analysis, project manager, construction worker, communication network, injury, personnel, United States, safety performance, construction work, social network, demographics, density, supervisor
Subjects: management, analytical methods, operations management, networking, sociology, occupational health and safety management, demography, practitioner, Geography, research methods, health conditions and diseases, profession
Topics: Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Project Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here