Antillon, E I; Molenaar, K R and Javernick-Will, A (2017) Evaluating the effect of contract timing on lifecycle-design innovation in public-private partnerships: Comparative case study of highway projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4): 05016023, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (P3s) are becoming a prevalent solution to address the growing infrastructure needs across the United States. Proponents of P3s believe that they enable the private sector to implement more lifecycle-design innovations, or design changes that benefit long-term project performance. While studies have explored innovation in highway P3s, to date none have explored the effect of contract timing on the ability to realize lifecycle-design innovations. This study addresses this gap by analyzing three design-build-finance-operate-maintain (DBFOM) P3s to explore the influence of contract timing on the private sector's ability to realize lifecycle-design innovations. Using innovation theory as a framework to measure the magnitude of lifecycle-design changes, the research explored contract timing of private involvement and analyzed whether this timing enabled or inhibited the ability of the project team to realize the promise of lifecycle innovations. Furthermore, through the identified examples, a conceptual model illustrates how the private sector's ability to perform more radical lifecycle-design innovations increases the earlier the partner is brought into a project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; lifecycle design innovation; public-private partnerships |
| Index terms: | design-build-finance-operate, design change, innovation theory, United States, project team, highway construction, project performance, lifecycle, private sector, partnership, case study, becoming |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, civil engineering, Geography, project management theory and practice, partnership management, industry analysis, philosophical process, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, project delivery |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here