Ballesteros-Pérez, P (2017) M-PERT: Manual project-duration estimation technique for teaching scheduling basics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9): 04017063, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The program evaluation and review technique (PERT) has become a classic project management tool for estimating project duration when the activities have uncertain durations. However, despite its simplicity and widespread adoption, the original PERT, in neglecting the merge event bias, significantly underestimated the duration average and overestimated the duration variance of real-life projects. To avoid these and other shortcomings, many authors have worked over the last 60 years at producing interesting alternative PERT extensions. This paper proposes joining the most relevant of those to create a new reformulated PERT, named M-PERT. This reformulation is quite accurate when estimating real project duration, but allows for a number of interesting network modeling features that the original PERT lacked: probabilistic alternative paths, activity self-loops, minima of activity sets, and correlation between activities. However, unlike similar scheduling methods, M-PERT allows manual calculation through a recursive merging procedure that downsizes the network until the last standing activity represents the whole (or remaining) project duration. Hence, M-PERT constitutes an attractive tool for teaching scheduling basics to engineering students in a more intuitive way, with or without the assistance of computer-based simulations or software. One full case study is described and future research paths are suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; graphical evaluation and review technique; program evaluation and review technique; project duration; scheduling; stochastic network analysis |
| Index terms: | estimation, programme evaluation and review technique, variance, case study, duration, project management, stochastic network, scheduling, estimating, bias, network modelling |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, networking, project controls, probability and distributions, project management theory and practice, financial and cost management, operations research, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here