Barbachyn, S M; Devine, R D; Thrall, A P and Kurama, Y C (2017) Economic evaluation of high-strength materials in stocky reinforced concrete shear walls. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(10): 04017074, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Previous numerical research has shown that high-strength steel reinforcing bars (rebar) combined with high-strength concrete can increase the lateral strength of stocky (i.e., low height-to-length aspect ratio) reinforced concrete (RC) walls in noncontainment safety-related nuclear structures as well as nonnuclear building structures. However, there is currently no quantitative information on the cost-effectiveness of using high-strength materials in stocky RC shear walls. Specifically, high-strength materials can lower the total rebar volume and simplify the rebar cage construction. Furthermore, reduced rebar congestion can allow for better field inspection and easier concrete placement, potentially accelerating construction schedules and reducing construction costs. This paper addresses the current knowledge gap by conducting a parametric numerical investigation on the total rebar weight and construction cost for stocky RC shear walls. The study focuses on walls typical of noncontainment nuclear structures, but also includes results relevant for nonnuclear building structures. Ultimately, the results demonstrate the economic benefits of high-strength materials for stocky walls in nuclear structures and may provide an impetus to positively affect policy decisions pertaining to nuclear power in the United States.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction costs; construction materials and methods; finite-element modeling; high-strength concrete; high-strength reinforcing steel; reinforced concrete stocky shear walls; safety-related nuclear structures |
| Index terms: | inspection, construction cost, rebar, economic evaluation, investigation, construction material, modelling, United States, placement, cost-effectivenes, nuclear power, reinforcing steel, reinforced concrete |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, financial analysis, management, economics, Geography, building materials, energy systems, financial and cost management, analytical methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Quality Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here