Discovering the transition pathways toward sustainability for construction enterprises: Importance-performance analysis

Chang, R D; Zuo, J; Soebarto, V; Zhao, Z Y; Zillante, G and Gan, X L (2017) Discovering the transition pathways toward sustainability for construction enterprises: Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(6): 04017013, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

There has been growing awareness and demand for construction enterprises' transition toward sustainability with an aim to maximize the economic, social, and environmental values of construction. This presents a significant challenge to both policymakers and industry practitioners as sustainability is such a complex concept that includes various aspects, whereas construction firms are usually resource-constrained. There is lack of studies classifying various aspects of sustainability according to their managerial priorities, thereby identifying efficient transition pathways toward higher sustainability levels for construction enterprises. This paper proposes transition pathways toward sustainability (TPS) for construction enterprises by conducting an importance-performance analysis of the critical sustainability aspects. The construction enterprises were firstly classified into different clusters based on their sustainability performance by means of cluster analysis. Consequently, the importance-performance analysis was employed to classify the various sustainability aspects of the identified firm clusters, followed by the development of the TPS. The results show that although there is general agreement on the high importance of economic-sustainability aspects, significant differences exist in the perceptions and performance of social and environmental sustainability aspects across firm groups. Therefore, there are considerably different transition pathways for the various firm groups toward higher sustainability levels. This research provides a useful reference for construction enterprises to evaluate their positions in the sustainability transition journey and to optimize their resource allocation for sustainable development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; importance-performance analysis; organizational issues; sustainability; transition
Index terms: resource allocation, sustainability performance, performance analysis, organizational issue, transition pathway, sustainability aspect, construction firm, sustainable development, practitioner, cluster analysis, environmental sustainability, China
Subjects: resource management, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, business, organization, health safety and environment, Geography, sustainability assessment
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here