El-Gohary, K M; Aziz, R F and Abdel-Khalek, H A (2017) Engineering approach using ANN to improve and predict construction labor productivity under different influences. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8): 04017045, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction labor productivity is a fundamental piece of information for estimating, budgeting, and scheduling a construction project. The current practice to estimate construction labor productivity relies primarily on the traditional method, which uses the published productivity data and/or the estimator's own experience, with an apparent lack of systematic approach to measuring, estimating, and predicting it. An investment for the sole purpose of productivity data collection and modeling is not likely to be successful for a construction company. To make the investment economically feasible, the productivity system should be integrated into the overall database and information system of the construction company. To achieve these advantages and overcome the current practice weaknesses, this paper introduces an engineering concept to document, control, predict, and improve the contractor's labor productivity. A wide range of influencing factors on the micro level (project management and administration) and the micro/micro level (activity level at construction site) has been considered. The proposed engineering approach was applied to model construction labor productivity of two construction crafts, carpentry and fixing reinforcing steel bars of different types of concrete foundations, using the artificial neural network (ANN) technique and utilizing the transfer function of the hyperbolic tan function (tanh). The results showed an adequate convergence with reasonable generalization capabilities, and more accurate and credible results compared with not only the traditional method, but also the existing approaches in the literature. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing insight into using different ANN activation and transfer functions along with a wide range of influencing factors to benchmark the contractor's construction labor productivity. Moreover, the utilized engineering approach shows how a readily available practical database can help optimize several objectives. It supports two main pillars of sustainable construction: the economic dimension and the social dimension.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; construction labor productivity; cost and schedule; engineering approach; improving; predicting model; tendering; traditional method |
| Index terms: | construction project, estimator, information system, body of knowledge, estimating, scheduling, sustainable construction, construction site, budgeting, construction company, artificial neural network, reinforcing steel, construction labour, construction engineering, labour productivity, modelling, estimate, foundations, dimension, project management, influencing factor, productivity, database |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, financial management, management, engineering methods, production management, project management theory and practice, sustainable construction, data management, information systems, risk assessment, profession, organization, modelling and simulation, operations research, building materials, work location, knowledge management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here