Fang, Y and Cho, Y K (2017) Effectiveness analysis from a cognitive perspective for a real-time safety assistance system for mobile crane lifting operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4): 05016025, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Operating a crane is a sophisticated job that not only requires extensive skills and experience, but more importantly a comprehensive understanding of the conditions of the crane and its surrounding environment throughout the operation. To enhance lift safety, various real-time assistance systems have been introduced to provide operators with critical information such as load moment and proximity to obstructions. However, previous efforts predominantly focused on the technology side, while the measurable impacts of such systems on actual lift performance from an operator cognitive perspective remain unclear. In order to ensure that an assistance system will improve rather than compromise the operator's lifting safety and efficiency performance, this paper introduces a crane lift assistance system designed from a cognitive perspective. To reduce the overall cognitive load of crane operators, the proposed system aims to improve the situation awareness (SA) of the crane operator in two major stages of human cognition process, hazard perception and hazard recognition, through autonomous hazard identification and a real-time visualization user interface (UI). An indirect, objective assessment of the lift performance outcome with respect to efficiency and safety criteria was used to validate the effectiveness of the system in improving the operators' SA. The results from a series of field tests were used to analyze the impact of the level of usage of the system on the lift performance change. Furthermore, the relationship between the individual characteristics of different operators and the system effectiveness was investigated. With the consideration of human factors when introducing new technologies, this research proposes an effectiveness validation approach from a cognitive perspective that can potentially facilitate the adoption of emerging technologies in construction equipment operations and the existing construction workflow in general.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognitive load; construction materials and methods; crane lifting operation; crane safety; real-time safety assistance; situation awareness; three-dimensional visualization |
| Index terms: | hazard identification, new technology, performance outcome, construction equipment, efficiency, system effectiveness, crane operator, effectiveness, construction material, emerging technology, user interface, field test, human factor, workflow, visualization, validation, lifting, cognition |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, assessment methods, cognitive psychology, human-computer interaction, management, design practice, performance management, construction equipment, professional development, financial risk, building materials, innovation and technology management, data collection methods, value management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here