Feng, K; Xiong, W; Wang, S; Wu, C and Xue, Y (2017) Optimizing an equity capital structure model for public-private partnership projects involved with public funds. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9): 04017067, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been utilized worldwide as an effective tool to fill the gap between a surging demand for infrastructure and a shrinking public fiscal budget. However, the successful implementations of large PPP projects are hindered by huge capital investments and high uncertainties. To solve this challenge, hosting governments may choose to offer public funds, including public equity and government subsidy, to the financing of special purpose vehicle (SPV) on the purpose of strengthening projects' financial viability and increasing transparency of SPV's operation. The involvement of public funds reforms the traditional equity capital structure and needs to be carefully studied. To facilitate relevant decision-making for both private and public sector, this research developed a genetic algorithm based model to simultaneously optimize private equity, public equity and government subsidy for PPP projects. The effects of risk factors are incorporated by utilizing Monte Carlo simulation. The Beijing No. 4 Metro Line project is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the model. Optimization results show that the proposed model achieves balance between satisfying project's financial viability and saving public funds. And it will significantly facilitate both private and public sector in determining an optimal equity capital structure which are involved with public funds.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | equity capital structure; genetic algorithm; Monte Carlo simulation; project planning and design; public funds; public-private partnerships |
| Index terms: | financial viability, private equity, transparency, subsidy, capital structure, partnership, project planning, capital investment, risk factor, implementation, genetic algorithm, strengthening, public sector, special purpose vehicle, Monte Carlo simulation, decision-making, financing, Beijing |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, algorithms, professional development, structural engineering, Geography, decision analysis, environmental hazards, modelling and simulation, administrative law, control systems, business management, economic analysis, partnership management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Legal Issues, Project Management, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here