Owner perceptions of barriers to prevention through design diffusion

Gambatese, J A; Michael Toole, T and Abowitz, D A (2017) Owner perceptions of barriers to prevention through design diffusion. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7): 04017016, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Prevention through design (PtD) is an emerging concept for reducing safety hazards and preventing worker injuries and fatalities. Existing literature suggests that diffusion of PtD faces several significant barriers. This paper reports the results of a funded 2-year research study examining how employees in owner firms perceive potential barriers to PtD, including designers' lack of knowledge about performing PtD, increased designer fees, and designers' resistance to PtD due to fears of increased liability exposure. The research included an industrywide survey of owner-organization employees and case studies of four owner organizations, two of which had formal PtD programs. Research findings indicate that barriers to PtD suggested in the literature are not perceived to be as substantial as predicted. Owner employees are attracted to PtD and believe that it is a viable concept for enhancing construction safety. In practice, implementation requires that owners are knowledgeable about PtD, communicate their interest in PtD to the project team, confirm PtD as a high priority, and establish project processes to implement and monitor its success. The research findings are unique; they provide evidence of a pathway for PtD diffusion that was not previously available. In addition, the findings contribute to the knowledge in this area by providing guidance on how owner organizations participating in construction projects can act to successfully implement PtD on their projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; constructor; designer; labor and personnel issues; owner; prevention through design; safety
Index terms: construction project, program, evidence, exposure, construction safety, personnel, injury, liability, face, survey, fatalities, implementation, prevention, project team, case study, owner, designer
Subjects: project delivery, contractual arrangements, psychology, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental health, liability law, sociology, health conditions and diseases, financial risk, production management, software systems, public and environmental health, health risk and incident analysis, management
Topics: Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here