Gambatese, J A; Pestana, C and Lee, H W (2017) Alignment between lean principles and practices and worker safety behavior. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1): 04016083, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Alignment and synergy between the areas of lean construction and safety management are expected because all near misses and injury incidents represent waste from the lean perspective. This paper describes a research study of lean and safety principles and practices with regards to worker behavior and safety practices. Specifically, the study aimed to investigate the extent of alignment between lean construction principles/practices and worker behaviors associated with construction safety. To conduct the study, the researchers used a multistep process involving a comprehensive literature review, document content analyses by an expert panel, and a survey of industry practitioners knowledgeable about lean construction. The findings support the perspective that many similarities exist between the application and impacts of lean and safety principles and practices. Lean practitioners surveyed believe that implementation of the last planner system as a lean practice is most beneficial to the following safety practices: management commitment, preproject planning, and pretask planning. The present study revealed that lean principles and practices can provide a valuable opportunity to further improve construction worker safety; however, the findings show that there is a difference between lean construction and safety management practices, revealing a gap with respect to worker behavior. Understanding and eliminating this gap is important for the industry to realize the full benefit that lean principles and practices can have on worker safety. To do so, the authors suggest expanding lean practices to further directly engage field workers and address worker behavior issues along with carefully communicating the lean message to construction personnel.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labor and personnel issues; lean construction; lean design; safety; worker behavior |
| Index terms: | safety behaviour, construction worker, implementation, synergy, literature review, construction personnel, content analysis, commitment, survey, personnel, lean construction, injury, safety management, construction safety, last planner system, practitioner |
| Subjects: | management, environmental health, health conditions and diseases, building construction, project controls, occupational health and safety management, partnership management, practitioner, workforce, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, psychology |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here