Quantifying and modeling the cumulative impact of change orders

Hanna, A S and Iskandar, K A (2017) Quantifying and modeling the cumulative impact of change orders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(10): 04017076, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The modern construction industry in the United States generated 5% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) in 2016. In an industry this large, it is inevitable that changes will detrimentally effect projects. Yet, existing studies on the impact of change orders suffer from insufficient sample size, lack of rigor in validation, or both. This study uses extensive data from 68 electrical and mechanical construction projects affected by changes to develop a rigorous statistical regression model that predicts the cumulative impact of changes. The input variables of the model developed in this paper include the percent of change orders initiated by the owner, productivity tracking, turnover, percent of time spent by the project manager on the project, and overmanning. This paper uses a process that differs from previous studies in that it supplements linear regression with multiple-variable selection criteria, statistical checks for multicollinearity, and a consideration of the existence of outlying or influential data points. In order to verify the continued applicability of the developed model, rigorous validation testing was performed using multiple cross-validation metrics. Finally, new project data have been collected and used to test the model to confirm its merit for continued use by industry practitioners and researchers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change orders; electrical mechanical multiple linear regression; productivity; quantitative methods; statistical analysis
Index terms: validation, quantitative method, practitioner, construction project, project data, turnover, United States, construction industry, testing, modelling, selection criteria, change order, statistical analysis, sample size, productivity, owner, gross domestic product, project manager, regression model
Subjects: sociology, statistical analysis, industry analysis, tendering, management, professional development, Geography, contractual condition, production management, economic analysis, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, business management, data science, professional practice, research design and methodology, profession, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Contract Administration, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here