Hummer, J E; Arocho, I and Rasdorf, W (2017) Approach to assessing tradeoffs between construction equipment fleet emissions and cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5): 04016122, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The environmental effects of construction equipment emissions have been studied in previous research. Total emissions for construction activities and projects were previously calculated for various transportation projects as well as for other project types. This paper focuses on how contractors can use different equipment combinations and make project schedule adjustments to reduce total emissions from construction projects. It presents a newly developed optimization model that companies can use to select a fleet for a particular project to achieve the reductions. The model can be used to minimize total equipment cost and total emissions, or to minimize total equipment cost while limiting (capping) emissions for one or more of six pollutants. When the model was applied to example construction projects, the predicted reductions in emissions were significant, ranging from 25 to 85% depending on the pollutant. When the model was used to minimize cost, a reduction of 63% of the total equipment cost was achieved from the minimum-emissions solution. The lower-cost solution also resulted in a 43% reduction in project duration from the minimum-emission solution. The major contribution of this paper is the development of a decision model that can be used to select construction equipment fleets to reduce emissions production or equipment cost. The model can be customized to take into consideration the equipment fleet available for each activity and can be developed in concert with preliminary activity scheduling to look at daily emissions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | pollutant, scheduling, tradeoff, construction project, construction equipment, construction activity, duration, environmental effect, equipment cost, transportation project |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, construction equipment, project controls, environmental impact, construction operations, production management, operations research, environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems, economics |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Time Control, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here