Handling risks of quantity variations in unit-price contracts

Hyari, K H; Shatarat, N and Khalafallah, A (2017) Handling risks of quantity variations in unit-price contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(10): 04017079, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Unit-price contracts are awarded based on estimated quantities while payment to the contractor is based on actual quantities of work. In many cases, estimated and actual quantities never perfectly match each other for several reasons. This divergence has direct impact on the contractor's profitability and poses additional risks to owners and contractors alike. This paper presents a price adjustment model for quantity variations in measurement contracts. The model adjusts unit rates for items based on the deviation from estimated quantities in order to allow the contractor to recover his indirect costs when quantities of work underrun. At the same time, it does not allow the contractor to obtain a windfall when quantities overrun. This balances the interests of both the contractor and the owner. The model is expected (1) to reduce submitted bid prices as contractors will not need to increase their submitted prices to account for risks caused by quantity fluctuations; (2) to reduce the motive for unbalanced pricing of line items to take advantage of perceived errors in estimated quantities; (3) to reduce the disputes arising around the interpretations of changed quantity clauses in contracts; and (4) to reduce the need for renegotiating unit prices when variations exceed the allowable range in the contract.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contract changes; contracting; estimated quantities; measurement contracts; price adjustment; quantity overrun; unit price
Index terms: dispute, unit rate, variation, motive, profitability, pricing, indirect cost, deviation, overrun, owner
Subjects: contractual condition, cost management, sociology, dispute resolution, project controls, economic analysis, psychology, financial and cost management
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Time Control, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here