Why do construction hazards remain unrecognized at the work interface?

Jeelani, I; Albert, A and Gambatese, J A (2017) Why do construction hazards remain unrecognized at the work interface? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5): 04016128, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Proper hazard recognition is an essential prerequisite to effective safety management. However, recent research has demonstrated that a large proportion of safety hazards remain unrecognized and unmanaged in complex and dynamic construction environments. Despite the importance of hazard recognition, there is a dearth of research examining why construction hazards remain unrecognized. Although few studies have examined upstream factors such as management support and experience that can indirectly influence hazard recognition levels, studies have not focused on downstream workplace factors that directly impact performance. The objective of this exploratory research was to address this knowledge gap by identifying potential impediments to hazard recognition while workers examine the work environment. In the first phase of the study, eight construction workers were engaged in a hazard recognition activity using construction case images captured from real projects within the United States. Brainstorming sessions were then conducted with the workers to identify why certain hazards remained unrecognized. In the following second phase, additional factors that impact hazard recognition and relevant industry examples were gathered by engaging an expert panel of industry professionals and academic researchers. The research process yielded 13 factors that can potentially impede thorough hazard recognition. A follow-up validation study with construction workers revealed that the most common reasons that lead to unrecognized hazards included: (1) selective attention or inattention to certain hazard types, (2) unknown potential hazard set, and (3) the perception that certain hazards impose low levels of safety risk. The findings of this research will be useful in developing effective hazard recognition methods and safety training programs that are cognizant of field-level challenges.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; hazard identification; hazard recognition; labor and personnel issues; safety interventions; safety management; safety training
Index terms: United States, personnel, construction safety, safety management, program, validation, hazard identification, low level, safety training, construction worker, work environment, exploratory research
Subjects: practitioner, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, Geography, professional development, financial risk, management, research methods, software systems
Topics: Digital Applications, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here