VDC scorecard: Formulation, application, and validation

Kam, C; Song, M H and Senaratna, D (2017) VDC scorecard: Formulation, application, and validation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(3): 04016100, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The authors have developed the virtual design and construction (VDC) Scorecard to encompass two characteristics, in which existing VDC assessment frameworks are weak: a holistic framework and adaptive scoring criteria. First, the Scorecard framework was developed to be holistic by including the vocabularies for measuring how well VDC is supporting its objectives. To make the framework holistic, the authors first developed the higher-level structure of the framework based on literature with holistic VDC themes and then refined the lower-level structure of the framework with nested interviews. Second, the scoring criteria were developed to be adaptive to evolving industry norms, which cannot be ignored in a field that is driven by rapid evolution of technology. To make the scoring criteria adaptive, the authors used iterative sampling and comparison methods for establishing the criteria. The resulting assessment framework is able to quantitatively and statistically represent the relationships between VDC and its objectives, providing a holistic assessment framework. This research also presents a plausible methodology for developing scoring criteria that gradually evolves with the industry norms, making the scoring criteria adaptive.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment; building information modeling; evaluation; information technologies; project management; scorecard; virtual design and construction
Index terms: validation, industry norm, scorecard, evolution, methodology, information technology, interview, sampling, project management, virtual design and construction, vocabularies, building information modelling
Subjects: research methods, performance measurement, professional development, project management theory and practice, digital design, information systems, business, data collection methods, computing systems, environmental science, knowledge organization and systems
Topics: Sustainability, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here