Identification, quantification, and classification of potential safety risk for sustainable construction in the United States

Karakhan, A A and Gambatese, J A (2017) Identification, quantification, and classification of potential safety risk for sustainable construction in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7): 04017018, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Sustainability is a balanced approach that puts equal focus on the environment, economy, and society. Research suggests that worker health and safety is an integral dimension of social sustainability. The present research contributes to the body of knowledge by assessing, quantifying, and classifying occupational health and safety (OHS) risk associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance of sustainable projects across the United States construction industry and compares it with OHS risk encountered on nonsustainable counterpart projects. The researchers conducted a credit-by-credit review of the leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) rating system to evaluate the potential positive or negative impact of green design elements and construction practices associated with the implementation of LEED credits on the OHS of construction and maintenance workers. The researchers also quantified OHS risk associated with LEED credits on 41 green projects distributed across the United States. The results show that even though a large number of LEED credits are neutral toward OHS, sustainable construction represented by LEED projects is associated with an increase in base-level safety risk. Finally, a risk model was integrated into a risk plane analysis to classify safety risk associated with each of the LEED credits. The risk classification analyses indicate that two credits are associated with unacceptable risk to OHS across the United States construction industry. It is expected that the findings from this research will benefit safety professionals, academics, designers, and all construction stakeholders by providing evidence of how their chosen sustainable designs may impact OHS on building projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: leadership in energy and environmental design; pilot credits; prevention through design; risk; safety; social equity; sustainability; sustainable construction
Index terms: occupational health and safety, sustainable design, society, sustainable construction, health and safety, United States, body of knowledge, evidence, designer, environmental design, quantification, dimension, implementation, prevention, construction industry, social sustainability
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, profession, sustainability and energy, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk, sustainable construction, design process, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, communities and social development, industry analysis
Topics: Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here