Khan, A; Do, J and Kim, D (2017) Experimental optimization of high-strength self-compacting concrete based on D-optimal design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4): 04016108, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Because of the high variability in the material content of high-strength self-compacting concrete (HSSCC), a huge number of trial sets (experiments) are often essential to find the optimum mixture proportions needed to achieve desired HSSCC properties. In the current investigation, an effort was made to considerably reduce the number of such experiments and to study the influence of different mixture parameters on the properties of HSSCC using a response surface method coupled with D-optimal design of experiment (DOE). In this study, water-binder ratio, cement content, fine-aggregate percentage, fly ash content and superplasticizer content were chosen as input variables, with compressive strength, passing ability, segregation, and manufacturing cost as responses. For each response, a full quadratic model and second-order polynomial equation was developed using central composite design (CCD) and D-optimal design. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to check adequacy. Responses were analyzed in blocks where two mixture parameter vary and others stay constant. To determine the efficiency of the approach, the D-optimality of the CCD and D-optimal design were studied and compared. It was found that the D-optimal design reduces the number of trials 40.38-50% compared with standard design with less significant change on responses (0.32-0.54% change for compressive strength, 0.93-0.415% change for passing ability, 0.99-1.35% change for segregation and 3.9-4.35% change for cost), and provides dependable predictions as demonstrated in this investigation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction materials and methods; d-optimal design; d-optimality; design of experiment; response surface; self-compacting concrete |
| Index terms: | composite, variance, efficiency, aggregate, investigation, construction material, fly ash, variability, compressive strength, experiment, design of experiment, response surface method, superplasticizer |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, measurement and scaling, performance management, material analysis and testing, modelling and simulation, building materials, materials science, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here